In this
blog we are looking at the phenomenon of property law and the existence of
property rights. For the purpose of this blog we will define property as
encompassing all forms of material possessions
(ranging from a piece of land to a cellphone to the food you buy in a store).
I would like to explain that property rights in their very starting point are
in reality a license to abuse and are thus detrimental to man’s continued existence
on earth.
The best
way one can see this is if one familiarize oneself with the principles on which
the Equal Money System (EMS) is based - where one of the ruling principles is
that property simply does not exist. In an Equal Money System property is no
longer necessary because everything is from and of the earth – and the fact
that one can use certain goods and/or materials merely means that these goods
and/or materials are available to you. This does not mean that you ‘own’ them.
It means that you can use them and that these means are now under your
RESPONSIBILITY and that you must see to it that the best possible use is made
of them in the context of what is best for all.
In the
current system property rights have an interesting structure. In Dutch law
property rights are sometimes even referred to as ‘three party rights’. The
reason for this is that in such rights there are three elements/parties
involved, namely: 1) The subject/owner 2) The object and 3) everyone else.
The reason
why ‘everyone else’ is part of this equation, is because what a property right
means, is that you as owner have a right to use or dispose of your property as
you see fit – and, everyone else should guard themselves of infringing on your
right to use or dispose of your property as you see fit. So a property right on
the one hand gives someone permission, and on the other hand it gives everyone
else an instruction. Obviously there are some restrictions to this right and
this freedom is not unlimited, however the gist of the definition is clear: a
property right is a protection mechanism to protect the owner against…
everyone.
One might
ask: protect against what?
Let’s again
look at the EMS.
In an Equal
Money System the resources of the earth are being managed and distributed based
on deliberate planning and calculation of what is necessary to be produced and
distributed. There will therefore exist a system of production and distribution
that will ensure that everyone have what they need and even more – and this on
an equal basis for everyone, making sure that not one single being has to exist
in any form of lack. On a material level one could say that an Equal Money
System will produce abundance on an Equal Level for everyone. This may seem
outrageous, but it is really not when considering the actual available
resources, and when taking into consideration how much is currently being
wasted or withheld through greed – and what could therefore even within this
current system potentially be done already.
Would you
need protection against everyone in a world where everyone is equally receiving
what you receive and where the common law is that whatever is given to you, you
must make the best possible use of in the context of what is best for all? The
answer is no, unless you are planning to abuse or deceive, because then you
know that you are being greedy and are abusing everyone’s trust. In an Equal
Money system it will be very easy to correct such behavior and there will be
intervention possible through reeducation.
Let’s look
at some outflows of property law: through property rights it has become
possible to justify and protect the existence of planned obsolescence, which is
the process of weakening (sabotaging) a line of products by the manufacturer
himself so as to make the product fall apart in time to create a new demand. Property
rights give the allowance for animal abuse and vivisection, as in most
countries either by law or by custom animals are regarded as property. Property
rights give the allowance for an elite minority to control the faith of all through
ownership of the resources of the planet in the name of profit, where even the
governments have little say. Strangely the law will also say that
the ‘free use’ of one’s property should not infringe on the rights of others,
however we have conveniently defined these rights of others (such as human rights) to be meaningless,
as is shown by the fact that more than half the world exists in conditions poverty.
Property
rights thus encourage irresponsible and psychotic behavior. The context for
property law and property rights in the current system is the belief that we
apparently exist in a reality of material lack, in other words: that there
isn’t enough for everyone. This is however not true as is proven through the
massive waste that is being produced by the system while on the other hand
billions exist in conditions of poverty and deprivation – for nothing.
Therefore
property rights are currently protecting those who have too much or who abuse
what they have, and are preventing any kind of intervention to stop this greed
as these laws (which are upheld under the banner of democracy yet at the cost
of the majority) are protecting their right to abuse.
When
through a system of decent administration resources are allocated so that
everyone receive equally, then property as such will have no more function as
the starting point of fear will be removed and there is no more need to protect
ourselves against everyone else.
Join the
research on Equal Money and cast your vote.