In this
blog I want to make a “critic”, if you want, to the perspectives that have been
brought on the “Basic Income Studies”:
Quote: “Rights are about advancing and
defending human freedom. They are universal and they are inalienable. I cannot
give away my right without degrading my humanity. To be meaningful, a right is
an aspiration, a goal to which we march.”
If one
aligns and fosters the circumstances, then one aligns the consequences that we
are searching…yet, there is a question that should be asked: Is that point
going to be able to sustain itself? Our current system was implemented in the
same way isn´t it? One creates a controlled environment, through the repetition
of circumstances aligned in a determined pattern of morals, ethics, rules and
suddenly you have an environment, a system operating accordingly within the alignment
that has been superimposed with the “initial starting point of the creation of
this system” which was (apparently) to create the best society possible based
on the “common good”, yet, “the goods were never available to everyone”, they were
never common to everyone, implying that those that were not aligned with the
“best civilization”, the best civilization being by definition that which is
more advanced on culture, and therefore that which is supposed to teach
everyone else how to live, are not worthy of been considering as “advanced
enough to take part in the important decisions and so on”, which is also what
happens on the structure of our educational system, those that are not
“properly educated” you know, they are there, they are criminals, they are
ignorants of what it means to be in a society, that is why they deserve to be
poor, and so on and so on; that is why the modern societies are apparently able
to sell you their law of attraction and their secrets to success and
essentially their education models, yet, none of them were capable to consider
a structure that can actually functions for each and every human being? Those
that didn´t align themselves with the rules were not able to be part of this
great dream, “The American dream” because you have to be sleep (or brainwashed
enough) to believe it.
Have a look
at our model of consumerism, our society is divided into classes according to
the amount of money available, is your position in the system, implying access
to education, food, clothes, house, etc.; Hasn´t been said that our human
rights are paid through money when they should be by definition, that which is
given to everyone unconditionally? And the point remains the same, If Human
Rights were real, they would not require to be defended or protected, one
shouldn’t have to compete for them, to struggle for them, to have to get money
to pay for them.
The
question is: Is it possible to propitiate the circumstances without any
understanding or education available for everyone in the same direction of
consequences which also implies the constitution and manifestation itself of a
right? Obviously not
Right to
labor! So…we need to propitiate the circumstances to develop our right to
develop, create and work? This is fascinating statement, because, it’s like
saying that you need to propitiate the circumstances to bring that which is
actually inherent to the Human, which is the development itself of work, yet,
of course not disregarding that each and every form of human activity have
consequences, which actually brings forms of development, creation and work
(because everything requires a certain input), nevertheless, what we are
developing, creating, working on, is really abusive stuff, weapons, drugs,
unhealthy foods, vicious cycles of greed, jealousy, anger, violence, you name
it. Maybe the question is: what is it that we are creating through our labor?
How is it that we are going to direct the development of humanity to bring the
change that we are looking for? What are we going to produce? More unnecessary
stuff that is going to be pilled on mountains of garbage in the outskirts of
our cities?
Another
interesting question arises independently, yet, connected and intertwined with
all of these…What is the purpose of our work? To sustain ourselves and our
survival? Our partner? …or…the future generations?
See, the
ultimate goal of marriage is reproduction; it was defined in this way in the
antiquity, and so this is lived today, but I want you to see the mental
relationship that we have created in regards to our human interactions; it
would seem that when we "learn" to form relationships…I say learn
because they are established on moral and ethical basis and regulations for you
to be able to define and maintain these relationships “within and without”. But
what would be our interactions without these defined structures? If you think
that it would be chaos, I strongly suggest you to first you see the interaction
in your physical body, the body is made up of trillions of living molecules
that are aware in your body, each one of them with the capacity to experience
pain that is actually expressed and manifested through the rest of the cells
thanks to the nerve connections that link it with the rest of their companions,
each one expresses their individuality, yet they are also collectively manifesting themselves in a body,
and that is, the interaction itself that manifests from the smallest point as
this molecule individually, to all of the other molecules with which it
interacts, and that is what makes possible, for each and every one of these
cells, to be sustained with and by each other, starting with itself, and just
considers the fact that a cell that is altered in its constitution , showing "a
cancerous principle" that can harm the group, it completely removes itself
from the equation, giving the opportunity to others to keep the interaction
with the welfare of the body; it is only when the infection is too much that it
is inevitable that the cancerous manifestation continue generating discomfort
on that principle throughout the physical body, it is something that has to be
manifested in the entire group of cells for the cancer to keep its constant
growing as this cancer with permission and acceptance of each one, in its
induced abuse to continue throughout the physical body, because what affects
one, affects all and the same goes amongst the humans, however, What is the
principle that is allowing the separation between humans that is this cancer?
This is due to and internal and external consequence, a consequence that is
manifesting itself as the disregard of what exists in the environment, from our
fellow humans, to the environment in which we exist, pollution of the
environment that has manifested disease, pain, violence , abuse.
First of
all we should look at the relationship we have created towards this world,
towards ourselves and our fellow man. See, If the ultimate goal of our
interactions, is only to get to the perfect relationship to create a family and
“have kids”, which has been abstracted within the concept that the experience
that we define as love, is what will sustain it, then it seems that we have not
understood what it really mean or interactions and our communication, with
ourselves and the physical, is simply not understood, this is the consequence
of our consumerist culture and it can be seen in the fact that there is not
real understanding of the interaction with our own mind, how it can actually
cause consequences that just seem to be "aberrant for humans" as the
manifestation of abuse and are considered unmentionable, and that kind of
“studies” are reserved for college levels, in which the students are misleaded
in their way of understanding how the mind works and operates, because the
psychologist are not being prepared for resolving the problems within the mind,
they are being trained to make everyone fits in the model of the “society”.
Work is not
competition, is not survival, is not gaining money, imagine what would happen
if the cells had the kind of separation that we as humanity are accepting and
allowing, or even the molecules within this existence, if no one cares about
the other maybe this existence never would have existed. What is the
manifestation of dead if not the separation of ourselves from the physical
body? It is said that when one dies, the body is left behind, yet, do you think
the heaven could be a “nice place” knowing that your beloved ones are dying in
wars, starving in poverty, suffering due to the survival system? Would you be
able to go to such a place leaving everything behind to live in complete bliss?
Obviously not, what if that was the ultimate test? It is said that the kingdom
of god is within man, the heaven is on earth, yet if we disregard what is here,
what heaven could exist if we focus only in what is awaiting for us in the
other life searching for our self-interest? The heaven on earth must be
created, by man, as simple as that, and for that, we cannot be separated, we
must work together, so, it doesn´t matter if you increase the minimum wage to
an sufficient amount to cover the basic needs without first have a structure
upon which we can re-educate "the culture of humanity" I refer
specifically to competition, and survival. Because then we are going to return
to the same bullshit, some people are going to be fighting to have the better
car, the better house, and are going to fight for more and more and more =
greed, why not to guaranty to everyone the best house possible, the best car
possible, without the programed obsolescence that comes “added” in your
products?
I suggest
you to read the following blogs to understand in a more specific way, how this
was placed:
Look at the
Declaration of The Rights of the Children, there is a fascinating thing that we
should consider, first of all, this declaration came “after” the Declaration of
Human Rights, and I mean, that is strange, because aren´t our children also
humans? For practical understanding of what I want to explain here: For you to
be able to exercise your rights, the State has to recognize you as a citizen,
and that is only acquired after having come of age, why do I say this? Because
it’s interesting that if the children were including in the declaration of
human rights, maybe they would be actually really consider as the pillar of the
entire Humanity, which implies that the principle of prevention of Crime,
Poverty, Diseases, etc., would be a total different situation that what can be
seen today, and to understand this, I suggest you to read the blog of “Children’s
Human Rights | Equal Money” link that you can find here:
The
question is why is it that one has to wait until you are properly
indoctrinated, sorry, have come of age, for you to be able to exercise your
rights?
“The child is already born into limitation as
young as 13 weeks of gestation in the mother’s womb where the parental patterns
are integrated as part of the mind that the new born will develop throughout an
entire lifetime. This is how no matter how much we would want to apply basic
human rights, the conditions that limit the newborn are already integrated by
default as the result of who we have accepted and allowed ourselves to be and
become in our mind that becomes the very
genetic information transferred to every newborn.”
Following
this quote, just consider the fact that the chromosomes that are transferred
during the sexual intercourse, are in fact what? It´s genetic memory; just
consider the amount of emotions and feelings that you experience in one day,
the patterns and orientation that they have in relation to your thoughts, for
this you have to be really self-honest, and see what is it that you accept and
allow, within that, just take into consideration the fact that, all of it is
going to become part of you genes, as it has become so much a part of yourself
that the substances that nurture your genetic material is in fact making and
developing the “nature of your genes and of course what would be the nature of
your child”; see the children have a predisposition to follow certain ideas and
patterns, but it is only as consequence of what is already integrated within
them, as them, isn´t that also why when the woman is pregnant, is necessary
that she follows certain diet? Because that is part of the components and
“materials that are going to mold and shape the physical body”, yet, the memory
and “nature” of the genes, will give to the child the mold and shape of the
“personality of their parents”.
“This also implies that no matter how great the
parents can be, by virtue of existing in one single environment in which we are
all existing in, it is virtually impossible to prevent the danger, abuse and
insanity of this world to affect your children, because this is the culture
that we have created wherein there is little to no support for children to
develop the trust and confidence within themselves to walk throughout a
lifetime – instead, the schooling process and education at home becomes the
survival-training in a world where life is not a given right and where each one
is taught to ‘fight for their right to live’ instead of it being given and assured
from the cradle to the grave.”
And what
the child is going to see around him would be consider as “normal”, why?
Because he/she will just follow the “nature reflected by those equal to
her/him”, and of course it will be accepted by consequence of that
predisposition of following, denying any common sense as that is not “valuable
as the logic that you require to survive in this system”.
The point
in itself, within the marriage bond, results in the creation of the family,
being the superior interest of the Nation, as it is the pillar of the establishment
and existence of the Nation itself, however, the manifestation of our
interaction and participation within this system, that was supposed to resemble
the existing physical interaction within us, is that of separation. Many comments
have come from this, from: "That’s how it is human nature" to
"is because of the government", because "it reflects what exists
within us" however, the constitution of our physical form, the magnitudes
of the separation that is manifested in our actions as humans, doesn´t come
from our physical body, it comes as a reflection of what exists in our minds.
If you have followed the links of the Creation Journey to Life blog, you will
see that the coercive control imposed onto the children, didn´t just came out
of nothing, it was mold and shaped and reinforced from the genetic code
impressed in the child, showing us what we have accepted and allowed within us.
That is where the “Basic Income “cannot sustain itself, and I mean, yes! It is
a step to develop a new system, yet it’s insufficient.
From the
Bill of Rights of the Equal Life Foundation:
16. The
Equal Right of future generations to receive a living planet free of pollution,
disease, hunger, violence and destruction so that life shall endure and thrive
into eternity now and forever.
Participate
and this time; let's really work on a world that is best for all
