In
this blog I will discuss the principle – and idea that exists within law that
each citizen of a country has a obligation to know it’s laws – and I will show
how unreasonable this assertion is, and how we can change the point so that we
instead have a law that is practical – useful and best for all.
One thing that I’ve learned while studying
law is that it’s extremely complex – it’s a network of do’s and do not’s
interwoven in a complete abyssal array, and chaos of non-specific words – and
the information as to how to interpret and read the laws is hidden, and spread
all over the place.
An example would be that – in order to
understand how a particular law functions about using narcotics – you have to go and
find a court case from 1950 – where it’s explained how a particular word in the
law is supposed to be understood; and I mean – on top of that – the courts
insists upon writing in a language that is ancient and accordingly almost
completely incomprehensible.
Now – imagine that on top of this chaos of
words that not even the most experienced lawyers, and law professors are able
to fully navigate themselves within – there exist a requirement on each citizen
– that he SHOULD know the law.
So – in Sweden you’ll be able to be
convicted – and incarcerated because you did something that you didn’t even
know was criminal to begin with – because apparently you’re supposed to know
the law – but just how reasonable is this idea that each one should know
the law when it’s obvious that even if you’d dedicate several life times just
to understand one single nations laws – it would be a project far to large to
be accomplished; as such – the conclusion can be made that this idea that we
should all know the law – is just rubbish – it’s an IDEA and not a physical –
practical possibility.
Now – in relation to this it’s also
interesting to ask oneself the question – if someone breaks the law, and
doesn’t know about it – can the law then still be motivated with saying that the
purpose of law – and punishment – is to uphold some type of moral standard in
society? But how can any such standard be upheld when nobody have a clue as to
what the standard is because it’s simply to difficult and hard to understand
the law?
The fact that there is an entire education
dedicated to studying law shows that there is a serious flaw in the justice
system – it shows that justice is not about producing a human character that is
best for all – but that it’s about politics, it’s about tactics, and it’s about
unpractical and imaginary principles – as to how people should behave, and live
that aren’t in alignment with what is REALLY here in this world.
Thus – in order for the law to fill any
functional purpose it must be SIMPLE and easy to understand – for EVERYONE –
and it must have the sole purpose of producing an effect that is best for all. This
is how we suggest that the law is to be established in the Equal Money System – then we would never need to hire a lawyer ever again – as each
and everyone would be able to read and comprehend the law – and see the common
sense within it.
